Open discussions
It was really nice to hear everyone talking about their topics of inquiry and to see how the stages of analysis have taken suit. There was a really interesting mix of responses as some people are struggling to define themes and narrow down the amount of emerging themes, and some have clear themes that have formed. I am the latter and think that the themes have naturally emerged and seemed to respond to the needs of the research. But after the Skype call, I have now turn to question why these themes stuck out for me, as this is qualitative research there is an interpretational stance on the data analysed.
The Skype sessions really help me to realise the assumptions that I hold as people share experiences and give opinions on the topics we discuss. Some of the topics that I noted throughout the Skype were:
- Remembering that everyones responses come with experiential backing or with pre-formed opinions, and in order to hear what they are trying to say it is essential to listen carefully to what they are trying to portray with their words, not just hearing what you think they should say. So many times I have wanted to say something but not known how to say it and deliver the words with clarity and justice.
- Critical reflection doesn't have to come from just your opinion of your journey. Sharing you ideas with others and listening to their response often finds bubbles of reflection as they share their story. What I call; sparks of realisation.
- There is no right or wrong way to do something. It is important to take ownership of the research and trust yourself to use your voice.
- Remember that the reader does not have all the information that you have. You need to give background about a topic being explained to justify the information, but also remembering to keep information relevant to give a clear picture (and to reduce word count). When writing, think about the reader, not just how you make sense of it.
- Themes are discussed in analysis of the data collection, but don't forget to find similarities between the themes instead of trying to departmentalise.
- Research is on going and should not have an end and neither should the analysis.
Comments